From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "incompatible implicit declaration" warnings with GCC 4.2.1 Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 14:53:03 +0200 Message-ID: References: <471D19E8.4020701@gnu.org> <471D2859.2050607@gnu.org> <471F3D78.7090008@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1193230400 28152 80.91.229.12 (24 Oct 2007 12:53:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:53:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Jason Rumney" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 24 14:53:21 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ikfjc-0004UL-Kb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 14:53:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IkfjU-0007RC-Gb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 08:53:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IkfjQ-0007QE-8w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 08:53:08 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IkfjO-0007OR-NW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 08:53:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IkfjO-0007OF-Jd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 08:53:06 -0400 Original-Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.183]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IkfjO-0002dG-91 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 08:53:06 -0400 Original-Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k34so222067wah for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 05:53:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=kEYFal+gOTU/UzROQRfFpCG7SHsmkQ2YujdX3jB9fYk=; b=ByVAjngt557kbhjBw7xH9D341ch78DJWPl12Em5r+a4ATZUUFgGv2CWxBd7oLRA3uIhsd65A4gzk94NGFZYXgQ9g1gn+utIUhxWpCEH4out18UExF7xNpwdvxbUc77SalCAkU7fh4kZqKTN5wPnDSHlR3frvDpam5eUsf9Kla/I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=MX3tn5Rdl2oTnaieSNaF2mzdhey9syyJDmn6n6jXW2Y+M5y7oRu9t/eXC8FYH+rfbVETb08AdN9/9YKib9Qm+c5ho37+zvCSLNbmXOjP9KTXDtUESI53CPKAoeNRmhGdp09L1v3JarvjOsliffwb4JK2gjfPmktYXWHwCNoldg4= Original-Received: by 10.114.167.2 with SMTP id p2mr665794wae.1193230384047; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 05:53:04 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.115.72.13 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 05:53:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <471F3D78.7090008@gnu.org> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:81649 Archived-At: On 10/24/07, Jason Rumney wrote: > They are not fixing a bug, only getting rid of compiler warnings, and > the changes were substantial enough to carry a risk of breaking > something, so I'd rather not. That's true for the `abort' warning. The one for `pow' can be cured just by including , I think. Juanma