From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 00:23:50 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20071010173802.GC787@thyrsus.com> <20071010214929.GB1297@thyrsus.com> <20071010221340.GA1578@thyrsus.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1192055051 6830 80.91.229.12 (10 Oct 2007 22:24:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 22:24:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel To: esr@thyrsus.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 11 00:24:09 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IfjyI-0002ND-UP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 00:24:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IfjyA-0005pY-8g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:23:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ifjy6-0005mN-5D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:23:54 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ifjy4-0005gF-56 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:23:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ifjy3-0005ff-Uo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:23:51 -0400 Original-Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.239]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ifjy3-00050O-Gn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:23:51 -0400 Original-Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 50so230607wra for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:23:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=zyyRyRcKzUhKXiCNQHX0LRNLhYjXqEZEVibY8FQjqrE=; b=s8spvkUcFmO7DhToyuBV06lDQMRppkikpRFgaUI8dW/82wgFlDm6nF/04eg2uWyDfotLBdc9u4h60n+pE64fKn6Qez3JOMVeFFfPtJ9xNBs9LexGHAedifQAl2gNUxGg4U+nX2mZpY5sHxwpbeHD045o2Q68Kh3a3Tdfjkz9mMU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=LexkrLZIXDQwo4xF7SRcm7BnHbzxVLn9Ru6KGYyIpCdE/F93YTQKHisRQmCkm2rpsroV7qVQM347jdd6BK/QVUSC/49Y6Su9GW+XHNiD5nTS0+2ksNR4fbK1cmNEiis1O+RvZUvTgr1JzecQuk87vsEk/yzIUnr/qHKCueS0W1I= Original-Received: by 10.90.81.14 with SMTP id e14mr1879710agb.1192055030806; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:23:50 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.90.103.8 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:23:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20071010221340.GA1578@thyrsus.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:80556 Archived-At: On 10/11/07, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > Juanma Barranquero : > How about this: VC can test whether some VCS considers itself responsible > for a directory. I could change the logic to error out when no VCS considers > itself responsible for the current directory. Would that cover your > use case? I think so, yes. Juanma