From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 23:42:54 +0200 Message-ID: References: <851wl5d9b2.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <86r6t5qdbo.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <861wl5q7al.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1192052592 30634 80.91.229.12 (10 Oct 2007 21:43:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:43:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 10 23:43:10 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IfjKf-0002pd-4a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 23:43:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IfjKZ-0004GE-04 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:43:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IfjKV-0004F4-Og for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:42:59 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IfjKS-0004EF-F6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:42:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IfjKS-0004E7-Aj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:42:56 -0400 Original-Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.224]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IfjKR-00050V-Uw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:42:56 -0400 Original-Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s7so307341wxc for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:42:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=F76T93lEL1FriZs3ZTx0rojz+xJqjn578hKkEyp7lMY=; b=fptEmC7/l7R3wr+UUqbQyz/Nzi54DG6I1h0B4Yjpm5lwdD5ZfG0wUdXdqc0qG2M0dT9yTdgwy8SbOhj06tfHEBcHR/t6vE+BPB5AOJZWa3kHbxdpWPjKIdSQ82OwF81L2asyNx6DzcGXICWYvasGoLER4bu4yjO/ADQxZ+kSKF4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=DvtxsvZ1zXF9MShRVY1RmOUyTFz9U6IWT7u4gYRtSA0lf194XcW6JPoE0Sc1f5LGmqaLPEsx+Z8EyIkTghb0bb3hEnC9Jr6Ipc1woGzOXrtk61CiKg5+uUkO62w/a/fvsIov8R3Xq3Bn/Fv0KCg6iEKquCjVWD1G6vvwWD0gQI0= Original-Received: by 10.90.90.3 with SMTP id n3mr1885884agb.1192052574985; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:42:54 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.90.103.8 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:42:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:80548 Archived-At: On 10/10/07, Richard Stallman wrote: > I will rewrite the doc string. Thanks. > The idea makes sense, but it would be an incompatible change. A > compatible change with a similar effect is to move the usual > processing into a separate function which the hook can call. > Want to do that? I think Davis Herring has made a compelling argument that the current behavior is confusing and the new one could be implemented with minor incompatibilities, if any. Juanma