From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Don't concat directories to file names Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 21:20:38 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87wsy6cvip.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87k5u5cydi.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <874pl9tbnj.fsf@catnip.gol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1182021653 14688 80.91.229.12 (16 Jun 2007 19:20:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 19:20:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: stephen@xemacs.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, miles@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 16 21:20:51 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HzdpH-0002Qt-TT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 21:20:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HzdpF-00078T-7S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 15:20:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HzdpB-000784-Ii for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 15:20:41 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hzdp9-00077g-EW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 15:20:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hzdp9-00077d-9N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 15:20:39 -0400 Original-Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.237]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hzdp8-000362-Tw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 15:20:39 -0400 Original-Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h26so1305891wxd for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 12:20:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=a5noqKQVGy7AX2rB+MjdkphcyX65gyfd7MsjUI7AIvKM77tFaZkhJh/VPW4N7nvSOuoZRYRo5OO/uQ+kYgc0bQPE/L8kBQT3Cekfl2jitbHQnPyBXyC7B3QyZ9dMs5FAKr2Uc++Z4OaUPHWSGLROrrdaGF37nne1JF58yb4IVHo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=MuTtBFKdhxDVSzR23mU15W3PAmQw8ydfun+bFSJwXHLiO+vqOnvuRHtDwBNMkEQMCvnl5RMbGUWrSfIB2ZN50olVfyzJARrQS7LGtsRFhV6ZCbOMAq1sJf9XEOWVY5R6YHfWufsZObwPQmtUPwoh+FFi+kg/53I5n3YzyhfNlsc= Original-Received: by 10.90.97.11 with SMTP id u11mr3259027agb.1182021638413; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 12:20:38 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.90.87.8 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 12:20:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:73105 Archived-At: On 6/16/07, Richard Stallman wrote: > I don't think anyone will care if they are different, but if so, > someone can make an alias. Obviously Stephen cares, or he would not have asked us to respect their prior name. FWIW, I agree with it. But the naming of the variable is not what concerns me more; what I want to know is whether it is OK to install the function I proposed, and with what name. Juanma