From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: feature request: indicator of minibuffer-recursion depth Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 01:19:21 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87hcp95lnf.fsf@kfs-lx.testafd.dk> <87sl8t4208.fsf@jurta.org> <87odjgyftq.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1181949578 3928 80.91.229.12 (15 Jun 2007 23:19:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 23:19:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, storm@cua.dk, miles@gnu.org To: "Juri Linkov" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 16 01:19:32 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HzL4i-0004lS-FK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 01:19:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HzL4h-0003OH-U5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:19:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HzL4e-0003Ny-Jq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:19:24 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HzL4d-0003Nm-3H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:19:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HzL4c-0003Ng-UH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:19:22 -0400 Original-Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.237]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HzL4c-0002S5-IA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:19:22 -0400 Original-Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 55so889047wri for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:19:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=IC4SOE0hP932nay9OJdZxFpUchV/psDmH4JJF5ngZZ8n0oPhKqlTuNnBWOQlIyClc02LkIbLzjhm5G89BKllnPGup7EdY3HrP6jce/j9THtPLihv3g9inI88lbpVrG/TKm00OQoj1EFzUSgKmlKZ/J1YWo9AhqN1Fz/mc/oefdw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=sC4Vid0JN47m8rAWfanRaKdVAHDY6BmmYBxZeAIOkcTgABmq7uaPHsiLbeajg9cKdTDpjy44PGQ8wS6Q0th5zupWTLr6mS+jBWaGDQLxVtDfO6yRhqaT2MvtKmHtY7tGNCzM7zRdidN/s+eWBhU/FUKdJFbfM/MWkLnXbVqFAhk= Original-Received: by 10.90.68.15 with SMTP id q15mr3207446aga.1181949562017; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:19:22 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.90.87.8 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:19:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87odjgyftq.fsf@jurta.org> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:73025 Archived-At: On 6/16/07, Juri Linkov wrote: > In Lisp, the user can change formatting, colors and placement of the > minibuffer depth indicator as the user likes. But how this can be done > with the C implementation? Have you looked to both implementations as they stand? The only way to change formatting, colors and placement in the elisp version is by hacking, while the C version includes a customizable `minibuffer-depth-indicator' just for that purpose (well, placement cannot be changed in any of them, truth be told). It can be added to the elisp version, of course. Or we could just go with the C version, which would have been committed months ago with no discussion, were not for the freeze... Juanma