From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: feature request: indicator of minibuffer-recursion depth Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:48:17 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87hcp95lnf.fsf@kfs-lx.testafd.dk> <87sl8t4208.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1181933361 17503 80.91.229.12 (15 Jun 2007 18:49:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 18:49:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juri Linkov , emacs-devel@gnu.org, storm@cua.dk, miles@gnu.org To: "Stefan Monnier" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 15 20:49:20 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HzGrH-0001uN-72 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:49:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HzGrG-0004g2-Qe for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:49:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HzGqK-0004P7-JO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:48:20 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HzGqI-0004OU-N0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:48:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HzGqI-0004OR-Jl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:48:18 -0400 Original-Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.230]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HzGqI-0007QI-6e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:48:18 -0400 Original-Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 55so838729wri for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:48:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=SkjmlWPaqeYD2DSd1KvYUz2pEwHj+BtXWWg9uLfGEAcJlHv3ETB/K62egAZSDLLEjob1Ongz27MDlsqYtYpR/tQjzBXhtYxH15VnmrUuhcCmRkR5IsMZqNvCGRtbYvYUOyaGLlNlHAL3REJFCupd3rqK82Z4Pz5BUMWhf6rwCzc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=cw8PLPJNsM9NIwzJm4uiUrCind21ycQAE9uc6SnVUTl+9WmmYLP30WToG/IFM9Spbkugd3n4JxehQvgWvoylG1BVaaxOfYNQJ/c8Csr007M7KAqPX19/VN2ctGpwv5cV7uupaJ0jComX1CtckVA/E3HR/YkCHxLGAf0dSeltVyo= Original-Received: by 10.90.98.3 with SMTP id v3mr3040365agb.1181933297601; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:48:17 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.90.87.8 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:48:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:72984 Archived-At: On 6/15/07, Stefan Monnier wrote: > AFAIK, the number of elements on this hook doesn't have any impact > on fragility. IMO, the more functions in a hook, the bigger the possibility of unexpected interactions. Call me paranoid. > I haven't looked in detail, but unless the Elisp code needs to go through > funny contortions to do its job No, no funny contortions. It's non configurable, though; it should be fixed. The C version is not a mode, it's always on (though it does nothing unless minibuffer-depth-indicator is a string of non-zero length). That's a big plus in my view. I hate having modes for trivialities: a new function and a new mode variable just for this. Grr. Juanma