From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: display.texi: (,) isn't documented. Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 22:09:47 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20070605231947.GA2058@muc.de> <853b14q351.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1181160595 22329 80.91.229.12 (6 Jun 2007 20:09:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 20:09:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "David Kastrup" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 06 22:09:54 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hw1pK-0000Nz-AB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 22:09:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hw1pJ-0005SX-SU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 16:09:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hw1pG-0005SP-HJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 16:09:50 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hw1pF-0005S6-3W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 16:09:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hw1pE-0005S3-Un for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 16:09:48 -0400 Original-Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.228]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hw1pE-0003g8-HZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 16:09:48 -0400 Original-Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h26so229716wxd for ; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 13:09:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=p1JzJvMKwcYZxVfzKBVy+lMuOuT/DoEemvVbJ52RJv2lEQqR34Vcpa5zUFwj8xVru8elTkvX5Zw19T5nNOdQ/PA3wyoF970hkQwAAVBbacdUvcqia5UR0FedqbQMfVOZ9a8ScwbrLjuWCWnyqRq0KKPSEkROPvyferxKB3/BQmk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=iUkcSvTDXpQ9nDMK6DF3uCd0HsOxQPltP6fL1A1sOanExcThKceFEkg76MSf7FZvjXFtt7n2P6zB1Wxyw5iqltVzTO7PlAEArOGl3A8r2lF8/14EUx53drJ7+1vFWiF+PLVNFnz7b1Cn97ldoMmm7ClSeJIgRKU3useqM8SEzHI= Original-Received: by 10.90.29.18 with SMTP id c18mr1050483agc.1181160587744; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 13:09:47 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.90.103.8 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 13:09:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <853b14q351.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:72367 Archived-At: On 6/6/07, David Kastrup wrote: > Maybe something like 561: and :2 and 561:2 ? That's visually > formatted, pretty understandable (also has some relation to error > message formatting), and even more compact. Yes! m:n (or m/n) is *much* more readable IMHO than "Lm Cn". I even force them to fixed width: (setq mode-line-position '(:propertize ("%5l/" (3 "%c")) face my-position-face)) It's not often that I edit files with more than 99999 lines or more than 999 columns. Juanma