From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: new Emacs maintainer(s)? Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 11:22:11 +0200 Message-ID: References: <878xb05ras.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <200706041853.l54IrLXb006451@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200706051632.l55GWNSZ026462@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <87ps4aue45.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87fy55cy7v.fsf@kfs-lx.testafd.dk> <86y7ixjwtd.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1181121756 6099 80.91.229.12 (6 Jun 2007 09:22:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 09:22:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "David Kastrup" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 06 11:22:33 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hvrio-0003rW-7j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 11:22:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hvril-00060A-Q8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 05:22:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hvrig-0005zm-VD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 05:22:23 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hvrie-0005zV-Ua for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 05:22:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hvrie-0005zS-M1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 05:22:20 -0400 Original-Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.227]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hvrid-0007XY-Jn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 05:22:20 -0400 Original-Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h26so71072wxd for ; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 02:22:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=caCbMZkqdfo3KGHiOIpWidr5d9OtlZmsWhnT+teEW8Hvyz32i6mDFOrNQcVek0lFfF9UaUzYmmxEX4/pIKHO61I93QX0X1fFl+Os5EUp0qnhnEB7PlKX2U+IpaNulVDclcxrP7gwYZ0/7u6cDOPsuuZIG6/E/6gsm6YlPnN5Z/A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FNvxXnTX6TU3s34J1lAo5wq6ysMwjmHpEEMonWOylw/3yluvOAfGJsJzhRAQWCHSqXefJn0GY2iE2AfQBhuUtIUFdR3Yu292gAuWEhBvYWLQJQYvsT2jQd3Dk9f+HojJ1ljMgS92gDbAgxUaFqsR2Ory+dQYHkgQBuXysxGVNWY= Original-Received: by 10.90.70.10 with SMTP id s10mr145979aga.1181121731102; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 02:22:11 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.90.103.8 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 02:22:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <86y7ixjwtd.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:72319 Archived-At: On 6/6/07, David Kastrup wrote: > I am not sure whether it is a good idea to discuss this sort of > personals question on the list: I was wondering the same thing. > Here would be my scheme for an ideal setup: > > 22.x principal maintainer: Chong. > [...] > 23.x principal maintainer: more difficult. [...] I > guess that my personal favorite here would actually be Kim, I pretty much agree 100%. > Now of course this kind of setup will depend on the people actually > being willing and able to step up to that kind of responsibility. Yes. There are a few worthy candidates; not that many willing, though. Juanma