From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: using empty_string as the only "" string Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 17:43:16 +0200 Message-ID: References: <462EE947.000007.15251@camay.yandex.ru> <4630A339.7000005@yandex.ru> <4631CA91.9020806@yandex.ru> <46330BC7.8040102@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1181058205 8684 80.91.229.12 (5 Jun 2007 15:43:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:43:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Dmitry Antipov , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 05 17:43:22 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HvbBq-0004aR-2T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:43:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HvbBp-0007Sp-M9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 11:43:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HvbBm-0007Sa-OV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 11:43:18 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HvbBl-0007QH-KQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 11:43:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HvbBl-0007Pw-Fd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 11:43:17 -0400 Original-Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.237]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HvbBl-0000I9-3I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 11:43:17 -0400 Original-Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 68so1044392wri for ; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 08:43:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ZFW1hSTXqZd3zjwhcmMARmymq7iddRVyCSNDIYdFqpGQ5dAIg2CEaedidFkKOHpoqGA6HTGGRiZ05NcqAkw/5Nh5aa8Cja/8KmWYzv5RKJ1ABMVCaSpd6+kIRgXYrbllh7q3y3WjPtH2mJ7rnTpF0cKbkWRYOZBMNMrLWCPWac0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=KqtKKhPrbwYTftWJYeeNwziL5RgjFllbjjpLmZHLPAqNIrfBcny5HCYohGeFIB8wz82zxlgH41sBnVJevRTq8mpO1BjA5hpbJD0eswXfTRQk7U+q+zeFVGdLKeBPI+9RC2dx1mt8uDLfn6hI7YxD5OIZWloZ1ro6hZTVEmspB6A= Original-Received: by 10.90.33.16 with SMTP id g16mr5061546agg.1181058196444; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 08:43:16 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.90.103.8 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 08:43:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:72276 Archived-At: On 4/28/07, Richard Stallman wrote: > Ok, so here is a version with two canonical strings allocated from pure space. > Both canonical strings shares XSTRING(s)->data, but it should be valid since > it can't be modified anyway. > > People could start experimenting with running with your patch. I've been using the empty-string patch for a while and I have not observed any bad behavior. Juanma