From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: [multi-tty] server-process set to nil Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 13:50:16 +0200 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1179748229 28230 80.91.229.12 (21 May 2007 11:50:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 11:50:29 +0000 (UTC) To: Emacs-Devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 21 13:50:28 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hq6PA-0004M8-8O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 May 2007 13:50:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hq6P9-0001Xo-LS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 May 2007 07:50:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hq6P5-0001XV-VM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 May 2007 07:50:20 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hq6P4-0001XE-Hd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 May 2007 07:50:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hq6P4-0001X8-A3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 May 2007 07:50:18 -0400 Original-Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.236]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hq6P3-00006P-TS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 May 2007 07:50:18 -0400 Original-Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s17so1555057wxc for ; Mon, 21 May 2007 04:50:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=bICA6jLtDBj3WzzD7B4bYoHqgCD2b3YEBYIZ6NTesQZ7dD5pkIPR2/SYhW7Z2lqUGaSh7iz+eC9JCGRc8P8R+COIggF7PbdrH8nMb87jbpuqdc6nHcMD4cjv2mUasaIngpHFQxhb2R3zT0/9wlujJx019RMWiVZ6uqxEulxVG7o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=TCrswWsTGI1a8U7khNLVPGZiQmkd+jWlqNFLFRZKloirmrjeZa0Y0xNvHb7Baec+YiFBpZd+dF0U0Sghqqyxu3ap2ccc6M5gMeY8Yeq9cFSqwTwnZqAQ1H9R2i9ztUEpU8v1D+Nbuv8DEyNbj7HXtxG903fafV+oQW6GYf5DFwM= Original-Received: by 10.90.93.6 with SMTP id q6mr3187846agb.1179748216703; Mon, 21 May 2007 04:50:16 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.90.103.8 with HTTP; Mon, 21 May 2007 04:50:16 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:71488 Archived-At: The multi-tty's server.el has (among many others) this difference with the HEAD one: ;; Now any previous server is properly stopped. - (unless leave-dead + (if leave-dead + (progn + (server-log (message "Server stopped")) + (setq server-process nil)) (let* ((server-dir (if server-use-tcp server-auth-dir server-socket-dir)) (server-file (expand-file-name server-name server-dir))) Is there any reason to set server-process to nil? I find very convenient the HEAD behavior of having the dead process still in server-process (until a new server is created, of course), because I attach properties to it when it is created and I use them at kill-emacs-hook time. Juanma