From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: doc patch: "Saving Properties" merge into "Format Conversion" Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 12:53:58 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87ps5m2s7z.fsf@ambire.localdomain> <17978.34192.154994.884454@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <17979.51666.93559.254397@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17981.10185.173469.54017@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <87slaav9jr.fsf@catnip.gol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1178448847 20010 80.91.229.12 (6 May 2007 10:54:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 10:54:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Miles Bader" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 06 12:54:06 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HkeNS-0000wH-CF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 May 2007 12:54:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HkeUI-0002XK-PH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 May 2007 07:01:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HkeUF-0002S4-68 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2007 07:01:07 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HkeUD-0002RO-SD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2007 07:01:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HkeUD-0002R4-CH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2007 07:01:05 -0400 Original-Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.237]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HkeNL-0001nf-7E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2007 06:53:59 -0400 Original-Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s17so1195443wxc for ; Sun, 06 May 2007 03:53:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=AihDJpJ3YSEDyXSh8oN0X7PiXM5MmWwhFQf1qHg8W430lqjUYDtEjHCaB78RypeZqxr9bJxvBPXcfCnyCcWbU1UlWxU7PxAps0+p4ICdZb2u0AnofW777++7fXSU9122CPGk8n3v9t+q5lFv2rBp8bBwZogciTtgj8QQ0rxWYdE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=XUYrQ6li6GRaynwSQ8rHvHo1L/YX9vIYbtDODlMbYrdhD5UcL/2y5vtl0oFYTB4Z/k9qOcGNR/MLq5vx2MBqqrEShj84uRQLT2IMsygxIVgAD4yFPJ8QsZPm+vVj34QFu12CDPLbhnB4gzeIyUddceZlcARPoUXpggqXQsVg4PY= Original-Received: by 10.90.69.8 with SMTP id r8mr4308050aga.1178448838402; Sun, 06 May 2007 03:53:58 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.90.103.8 with HTTP; Sun, 6 May 2007 03:53:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87slaav9jr.fsf@catnip.gol.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:70585 Archived-At: On 5/6/07, Miles Bader wrote: > Richard's actions towards the release aren't perfect, but in general > things seem like they're getting there. Do you want the same (non-documented, AFAIK) release procedures being used for future releases? Would you consider acceptable to delay 23.1 if not for five years like 22.1, for two or three? People who volunteer their time and energy to this project, and just want a more productive development/release model, do not deserve being called "negative" or compared to spoiled brats, IMO. Juanma