From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: when emacs 22.1 release will ready? Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 01:29:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: <259495020704291337s35dd584fi3b7ef1dd511b11d4@mail.gmail.com> <4635B7F9.8090909@gmail.com> <4635B8F8.9020309@gnu.org> <4635BCB6.9060108@gmail.com> <46366011.4010301@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1177975753 19416 80.91.229.12 (30 Apr 2007 23:29:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 23:29:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 01 01:29:11 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HifIs-00053Z-Pg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 May 2007 01:29:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HifP7-000630-1m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:35:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HifP3-0005zK-Bt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:35:33 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HifP1-0005sX-2Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:35:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HifP0-0005sC-RB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:35:30 -0400 Original-Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.226]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HifIl-0003Jx-Rz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:29:03 -0400 Original-Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s17so594630wxc for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:29:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=biMWViuTFUrKzPAfSnAZaIIVb+MrFcyERhpdXK+a9oo/GmA17kHHXkb5u5noIaw7ksS4hjAKYjhSDsjt9YvM7xkLgzcAtPp1t+FKQnpMWi4OdaGo5oyVqRHr01FBkskW7otAnQEX3zd1LC78EBue1qYwb2skvYIj2BB82n4ZNDk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=uSxnPgUmMt45vJDuoEnfS14jlBeQqGXQE4hd7rh1AoVO8bWvzGJ1+tgDitRWppxZbmiIKpV/DiSxO6pO4Gqgrc0Bxc4tFIlTgFS3qB9U5vIj+5TKB87LmTCl+sHrYF4D7T717mT09zKKzVGvtWqGFFJTDqaXVvioGUaz0l77GDM= Original-Received: by 10.90.87.5 with SMTP id k5mr5796834agb.1177975742034; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:29:02 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.90.87.8 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:29:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <46366011.4010301@gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:70434 Archived-At: On 4/30/07, Lennart Borgman (gmail) wrote: > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Jason said ``zero code changes''. Zero changes can never cause any > > regressions. > > That of course depends on how you define it. Do you mean there are several meaningful ways to define "zero code changes"? Juanma