From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: Bold font hides end of previous character Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 16:56:16 +0200 Message-ID: References: <49be4d49d502.49d50249be4d@net.lu.se> <4607D23A.4060000@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1174921004 12086 80.91.229.12 (26 Mar 2007 14:56:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:56:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, Emacs-Devel To: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 26 16:56:35 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HVqca-00018D-7g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2007 16:56:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HVqep-0005o8-9B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2007 09:58:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HVqeh-0005ld-0j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2007 10:58:43 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HVqee-0005kh-Gu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2007 10:58:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HVqee-0005ka-4e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2007 09:58:40 -0500 Original-Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.175]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HVqcN-0007dT-Vc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2007 10:56:20 -0400 Original-Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id j3so1769487ugf for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2007 07:56:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jH9lgQQG5R1TU1hWZ1E0u0qgtoOXIwXpvLPykJm3AFt9o4k66rnDAiWx2voq7HLr0RArijZxhImGakNRIvgnbr48HSNoms2r8dyR7wjLL2oMbWb1w+D7lIGOxXGh+mhDY3UIfrsZoLcylVNrf72CtPbnNoXPE6InOU5E93C+FBw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FjVlAsYXdh9mBhA5hkwS7tm8b+NUdlNZfkn8wDJ0Zg1XPoU8eX562l3hs4FNu4V6buYqfJbgjSfWVk9lBYAtDvG5hCB+y1UQq1oKCLAxPkuGFKaTqlRu5ttwyc/+30MfqqgKpKTJ0+I8SAdgKvJQ4FEaNhTLXbYZDSPCYPdYqCU= Original-Received: by 10.114.168.1 with SMTP id q1mr2664561wae.1174920977000; Mon, 26 Mar 2007 07:56:17 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.114.234.16 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2007 07:56:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4607D23A.4060000@gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:68611 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:17781 Archived-At: On 3/26/07, Lennart Borgman (gmail) wrote: > Ehum, no. I thought there was no use in trying that Oh, of course, I asked about ClearType because it obviously had no relation whatsoever... :) > So now I have some reasons having ClearType on and at least one having > it off ;-| There are issues with ClearType; see for example this item from admin/FOR-RELEASE: ** Drew Adams 12 Aug bug rpt: overlay display artifact: trace left behind Windows only bug. Bug appears only when Cleartype enabled, probably related to the hack introduced on 2005-07-01 to fix some other Cleartype problem. In fact, your problem could be related to the original problem fixed by Jason's original patch of 2005-07-01. BTW, what font are you using in your tests? Or does it happen with any font? Juanma