From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [DIFFS] Re: Connection to emacs CVS broken ? Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:38:35 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87k5xi45h5.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <17913.45372.941749.353301@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <45F9C5E8.1010700@gnu.org> <87ps7am73r.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <17913.59348.720489.675967@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <87y7lxde4n.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1174037933 26214 80.91.229.12 (16 Mar 2007 09:38:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:38:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Glenn Morris , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Chong Yidong" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 16 10:38:46 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HS8tX-00063I-Kg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:38:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HS8ud-0007vz-9X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 04:39:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HS8ua-0007uu-4T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 05:39:48 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HS8uY-0007rl-7C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 05:39:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HS8uY-0007rQ-4g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 04:39:46 -0500 Original-Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.170]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HS8tR-0001tr-IN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 05:38:37 -0400 Original-Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id j3so722922ugf for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 02:38:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=oj1xsF389UpY+UUVpFEUBgv0OUlMwPJVxsnPrE2TXJcH8N189wk+Pe5bZtKA2jDEZzIV+jlQWFHGO05PhfXlXpuGlbnHW3Hd34HToturKtgffNAcsiWuQxmFyCXwjOHIfdGaLxilNn0N599j0eTb8lnkSBBWwLoy40b47geLUVk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=fYb2WIiMQ0hfiR+6B7DlYmXDdrBNuzLhhGFWoV3QlXA3s5unsHrY2DG0fSUZW7aehrKhk38BuazWaJn+gQXM1usB7Xw+QLaWmRt/ZLXry+7wbtuubRDV+pv95dyJMblFZddxNAs6RjX2Ueji6YY4f5YA2q/ORQkt2LoRcfWOIDI= Original-Received: by 10.115.32.1 with SMTP id k1mr643518waj.1174037915378; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 02:38:35 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.114.234.16 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 02:38:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87y7lxde4n.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:67997 Archived-At: On 3/16/07, Chong Yidong wrote: > This is the most straightforward method. OTOH, the best method, results-wise, would be for everyone who did a commit in the last week or so to check whether their code is in, and re-commit if not. We're talking of about three or four days of changes; it's not that big of a problem after all. The obvious downside is that it'll be a PITA for people who did many, or complex, commits because they'll have to disentangle them from one another or from other people's changes :( Juanma