From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Pretest? Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:04:21 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87slcf8qxr.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <20070309135920.GA3560@kobe.laptop> <87hcsuwk6w.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87hcso2akn.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1173953080 11093 80.91.229.12 (15 Mar 2007 10:04:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 10:04:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 15 11:04:30 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HRmow-0007jr-1J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:04:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HRmpu-000130-LU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 05:05:30 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HRmpq-00012v-Mz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 06:05:26 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HRmpo-00012d-Ul for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 06:05:26 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HRmpo-00012S-OY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 05:05:24 -0500 Original-Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.228]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HRmop-0006rt-5f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 06:04:23 -0400 Original-Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 76so23746wra for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 03:04:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=VnjN5Btf1CMRnVNm7omlI4o5pxoQkzHMzIXFQVia7nuTAMCbIPPNkqx5IfvJcWpTEFrMOuCtuXpyjR1yApmpb3X8LJaTxsSe1t0ndoJOnmCqVuJgID5jCQUBMMcnsSukShLFlYBXvtfXA/45bnv9dMF2+fgrVk6WX6G9tMQUnt4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=iXwPx0hpZ4n9Csrgt9uux/EfJwYotLibz+EBMlNv9dAF/Dux7v5apqL20SmwQa9EWhXDCEiAilOuPAAmzwCEKm5Rj+w6QqH2UTsA8NXy4uJYebJi6ah8a5dXVR0Wi9Bldlnb1dvibqQAq4GYv0kVVTHF354F6iZ3+WVqYJOnDrg= Original-Received: by 10.114.36.1 with SMTP id j1mr12665waj.1173953061902; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 03:04:21 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.114.234.16 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 03:04:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:67954 Archived-At: On 3/15/07, Richard Stallman wrote: > That is right. The user will see the other buffer appear, and can > either finish or cancel the command that is in progress. I think that > is less harsh. For some definition of "less harsh" that maps nicely to your tastes, perhaps. I much prefer to be interrupted, and profoundly dislike any code that splits my window without my explicit request. (Consider this as a petition to, at the very least, add an option to enable the interrupting, non-window-splitting behavior.) Juanma