From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Pretest? Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 16:46:51 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87slcf8qxr.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <20070309135920.GA3560@kobe.laptop> <87hcsuwk6w.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1173714441 31719 80.91.229.12 (12 Mar 2007 15:47:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:47:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stefan Monnier" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 12 16:47:15 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HQmjv-000726-Jt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 16:47:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HQmkb-0005Yn-4I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 10:47:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HQmkO-0005Yi-Q6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 11:47:40 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HQmkM-0005YW-FT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 11:47:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HQmkM-0005YT-8N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 10:47:38 -0500 Original-Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.171]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HQmjg-0003kH-1I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 11:46:56 -0400 Original-Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id j3so2566268ugf for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 08:46:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=V3etj2Rf4XNDaMfXsP5+uQNR3QoUX49uJkH4oJ32SrD8Yl/xb/0Bz0q3RaMx2+cLvyhqorg+bOePG+Z+Bz80cqgn3I0WKNeigxX5o9oWkNDes7OgIioI5/oFrtl3lifLPTcxsqSjV4XDQ8IPIK/tBfk+edXnPJFLog97aduxGFE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=bwCqPhmp+Slr5x1m3k3Axj1i7Mp0G4XjsZZUNld6TZ739acHS3ANHth7ZrbWt/eZWNdhXFkPiksVvCVfVhwgRK2ZAs8SUo4Ndl4NA71nh8bmjrl+5QAtRyNPmn0Sqj0vpRlQCM6Gv/So3iAOdgUFVhL2pAIvp+X1Utm34hvS8lU= Original-Received: by 10.114.159.1 with SMTP id h1mr1720347wae.1173714411552; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 08:46:51 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.114.234.16 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 08:46:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:67797 Archived-At: On 3/12/07, Stefan Monnier wrote: > I don't see why this should delay the next pretest. It seems a bit silly to release a pretest just to change something non-trivial immediately afterwards. The patch I'm proposing is trivial, but IIUC what Richard is saying, perhaps greater changes will be needed. There's no harm in waiting a day or three, is it? Juanma