From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 01:31:08 +0100 Message-ID: References: <45E8657D.4080202@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172881894 28055 80.91.229.12 (3 Mar 2007 00:31:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 00:31:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel To: "Stefan Monnier" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 03 01:31:27 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HNI9m-00015A-O5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2007 01:31:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HNI9l-0003dp-Vr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Mar 2007 19:31:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HNI9Z-0003da-4n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Mar 2007 19:31:13 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HNI9W-0003dO-Pf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Mar 2007 19:31:11 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HNI9W-0003dL-Iw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Mar 2007 19:31:10 -0500 Original-Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.172]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HNI9W-00086c-8d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Mar 2007 19:31:10 -0500 Original-Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id j3so957106ugf for ; Fri, 02 Mar 2007 16:31:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=dab0CFxhZUUfIEzTDwQfPTNFslTG2zqmn6q+UPOmtxBlAOQaogd4n63JcX3KcQfXzKC0UdR2T2xcbHDo214dHYWSduLcUPccJr+7c0+iS2D3B+caYea7d1DCqJOp9QDWuJBtg1dUQZJDo6+1Rc4MpvWuVZw8gQjxq5LU4KxmsuA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jPZSFLgxy4RgRO1kCjSuyW0NrEJibaZg4Y+cUMYtnsgPX9UBcy2egALS0KkTkvLNsq6kkDWnSCvY21/7n5ufzKQvhMqZoSwTkV7AohJ11akthxsao5C6Abnilsjuvi3mBsqCtZMhF8piDhyRnHe4JB3IpuaDix6I7Bytvez8b94= Original-Received: by 10.115.54.1 with SMTP id g1mr435549wak.1172881868705; Fri, 02 Mar 2007 16:31:08 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.114.234.16 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Mar 2007 16:31:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:67245 Archived-At: On 3/2/07, Stefan Monnier wrote: > Yeah, probably. But it's been the case sine Emacs-20. And some of the > bindings which worked in Emacs-20 failed in Emacs-21, and some of the > binding that work in Emacs-21 will fail in Emacs-22, and the same for > Emacs-23 most likely. And if you add modifiers it's even more likely > to fail. Still, a note would've saved me a few hours. :) Juanma