On 3/2/07, Stefan Monnier wrote: > Oh, so I misunderstood the original report: read-key-sequence does not > return 186, but 2234, i.e. it's working correctly. Yes. On my first message I wasn't talking about º, but C-M-º, and (event-basic-type (aref (read-key-sequence "") 0)) => 186 when you type C-M-º (but 2234 when you type º). > The fix for it is to change w32 so that it does the decoding earlier, as is > done in X, rather than via encoded-kb. Before the release? It is not the most serious of bugs, but it is a bug nonetheless that: (global-set-key (kbd "C-M-º") 'my-command) M-x describe-key RET C-M-º => "C-M-º is undefined" Juanma