From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: EXIT_SUCCESS and NO_RETURN in /lib-src Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:09:03 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1171357868 5324 80.91.229.12 (13 Feb 2007 09:11:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:11:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "William Xue" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 13 10:11:00 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HGtgf-0005iK-Ve for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:10:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HGtge-0001aA-PA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 04:10:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HGtev-00019S-Ar for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 04:09:09 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HGter-00017n-OH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 04:09:08 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HGteq-00017N-By for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 04:09:05 -0500 Original-Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.230]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HGtep-0003hl-V4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 04:09:04 -0500 Original-Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 71so2136061wri for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 01:09:03 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=cty2N2ERfDCjz8vP+hS75fIDRRIJ7LiG3W/oG+bWTzm8vU38rI9NJtFw0c9YWkc4lqZuO5RcDdO2Hq/cyHAHcepU4AffgGM8klFAKkqGO2BzeYwFaD4jWzp14sGBQ0qv9Sk4Lsdr0zPgphP6wzWDuJve5lElTleUTWK5vlomueo= Original-Received: by 10.115.108.1 with SMTP id k1mr6420260wam.1171357743083; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 01:09:03 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.114.234.16 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 01:09:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66333 Archived-At: On 2/13/07, William Xue wrote: > It seems that only one -I flag allowed in this situation. > I specified the include path because I put all the graphic's header > files(gif, bmp, jpg, tiff, etc) in there. > > I did not know many about the flags in MinGW and GCC. Is there something > wrong or it is the limitation of the compiler? FWIW, I build the emacs-unicode-2 branch on Windows XP with MinGW (gcc (GCC) 3.4.5 (mingw special) according to -v), passing -I to configure.bat: cmd /c configure.bat --with-gcc --no-cygwin --cflags -IC:/emacs/build/include and it works just fine. Juanma