From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bootstrapping Unicode branch on Windows Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 17:23:18 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1171038224 23730 80.91.229.12 (9 Feb 2007 16:23:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 16:23:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Eli Zaretskii" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 09 17:23:37 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HFYX6-0005lL-VP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 17:23:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HFYX6-0000He-EZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 11:23:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HFYWv-0000HP-FW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 11:23:21 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HFYWt-0000HD-KH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 11:23:20 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HFYWt-0000HA-Gd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 11:23:19 -0500 Original-Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.237]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HFYWt-0005GI-3K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 11:23:19 -0500 Original-Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s1so799550nze for ; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 08:23:18 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=YzLbRHUTAdAzvwiQjeiojoEJMJAFXzC4bjDdr6HrgwVnYCR97HH5fb8u7GWbCZGQAjeFzAM299aJ817esyhG8Q4BbDYiIlFL3RkdnUHadBgZWyWYFwlpnjUeJIaoSC1viBAk6JcjxRe7eWAzdY+VWqlTkb7okTaSKobjrFoPzkk= Original-Received: by 10.114.122.2 with SMTP id u2mr5007374wac.1171038198356; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 08:23:18 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.114.234.16 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 08:23:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66177 Archived-At: On 2/9/07, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Actually, I think these are all signs of bugs that should be fixed. The CRLF vs LF vs CRCRLF issues, for sure, after the unicode-2 merge. I was talking of saving some poor soul the time I've spent fighting these hidden issues. But I guess isn't worth the time if we release soon (hey, a guy can hope...) and merge the unicode-2 branch. /L/e/k/t/u