From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: cannot understand Elisp manual node Glyphs Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 12:32:59 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87y7n9ins4.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <864ppxhw0l.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1171020802 2781 80.91.229.12 (9 Feb 2007 11:33:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 11:33:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com, miles@gnu.org To: "Kim F. Storm" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 09 12:33:19 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HFU0E-0005wl-Pp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 12:33:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HFU0E-0005lT-8q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 06:33:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HFU01-0005j1-Ko for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 06:33:05 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HFTzz-0005h7-Ml for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 06:33:04 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HFTzz-0005gx-JT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 06:33:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1HFTzy-0006iA-GE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 06:33:02 -0500 Original-Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.232]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HFTzx-0002XB-ES for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 06:33:01 -0500 Original-Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s1so726580nze for ; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 03:33:00 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=aUkwgVW+nF0Nn6HP8JgInCPxjt451yEAKY9Or4UMRprqoVSVlQzzr8CkeBRTDQj87IDBrp3UoGqJyuAVrnt+pdMH+a6dszO3wyAHKSCY5aCgytPHs14DzgIjiZCClRZd94yZvcsX/B9LR+EHX+TM+JnNIkw0Si01g9o35QcMxig= Original-Received: by 10.114.200.2 with SMTP id x2mr4676790waf.1171020780064; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 03:33:00 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.114.234.16 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 03:32:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66158 Archived-At: On 2/9/07, Kim F. Storm wrote: > WDOT ?? I think it's not a new feature, it's much cleaner that the current way, and a needed abstraction. It's a bit absurd IMO to be making deep changes to the way we support images, user-wise, and then discuss about adding three functions, almost one-liners, which improve clarity and documentation for a much misunderstood feature. (No, the above is not a cheap shot towards the image thread, just an obvious example of not-so-trivial changes going on Right Now.) /L/e/k/t/u