From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: cannot understand Elisp manual node Glyphs Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 17:36:54 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87y7n9ins4.fsf@catnip.gol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1170952654 11467 80.91.229.12 (8 Feb 2007 16:37:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 16:37:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs-Devel To: "Stefan Monnier" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 08 17:37:19 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HFCGo-0006qo-JQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 17:37:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HFCGo-0004z6-4m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 11:37:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HFCGd-0004z1-5Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 11:37:03 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HFCGa-0004yp-QV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 11:37:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HFCGa-0004ym-KO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 11:37:00 -0500 Original-Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.234]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HFCGa-0006Ey-9a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 11:37:00 -0500 Original-Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s1so505603nze for ; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 08:36:59 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=KATM0JXEGaTnrqWOG2NEAyJn5rSZD6IeF/PFL6vOUWIzfSw0b4VOAgkpybRF4wtddet50pd9QvY3OF6rwyxEoNkmqE9foeDKW/dGx/EBr/RaWUbDioJy2kN4g24P7GWAfes9cAC9Fea6V7QzLEPkN0ZpXjwAhIedX+pN2fld5xM= Original-Received: by 10.114.152.17 with SMTP id z17mr4385290wad.1170952619404; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 08:36:59 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.114.234.16 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Feb 2007 08:36:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66122 Archived-At: On 2/8/07, Stefan Monnier wrote: > >> Good idea, but why not just call it "make-glyph"...? > > Because Xemacs already has a function named make-glyph with > ^^^^^^ > XEmacs ;-) I've had to restrain myself from sending him a patch :) /L/e/k/t/u