From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Image mode Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 12:15:33 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87k5yxeg19.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1170674191 14683 80.91.229.12 (5 Feb 2007 11:16:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 11:16:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juri Linkov , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Chong Yidong , Miles Bader To: "Kim F. Storm" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 05 12:16:24 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HE1pf-0002qf-4k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 12:16:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HE1pe-0006wN-Fe for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 06:16:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HE1ov-0006vB-N9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 06:15:38 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HE1ot-0006uP-Qk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 06:15:37 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HE1ot-0006uF-3U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 06:15:35 -0500 Original-Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.248]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HE1os-0006Xa-PE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 06:15:34 -0500 Original-Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b8so863067ana for ; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 03:15:34 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=SLj334KSpQGrSCNqSWUG8SJIv7pu9XTlOlPId+ETCeiUt4eMzzSfBS+SBSMa78ZM/IzKTprQSXR9Sxpt7dG8JC4CS5Z7T2NzcqlRAkbgBnHvOn/eeORBsusWfF25SXkR4St1rUVVKpOx6NH/gPrXQBD23PTO+NNWquUltKz2CQQ= Original-Received: by 10.115.46.9 with SMTP id y9mr579366waj.1170674133808; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 03:15:33 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.114.234.16 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Feb 2007 03:15:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:65906 Archived-At: On 2/5/07, Kim F. Storm wrote: > In fact, I find the current issue of image auto-detection pretty silly. Image auto-detection, or image security protection? The two issues are conflated, though image auto-detection as it works now seems reasonable (though I wouldn't object to its scrapping if someone proposes anything better, of course). /L/e/k/t/u