From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New pretest tarball 22.0.93 Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 22:01:46 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87hcuia6c4.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1169845330 20507 80.91.229.12 (26 Jan 2007 21:02:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 21:02:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Chong Yidong" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 26 22:02:03 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HAYCw-0006mZ-6i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 22:02:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HAYCv-0002sX-UN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:02:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HAYCk-0002sS-JB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:01:50 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HAYCi-0002sG-4y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:01:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HAYCi-0002sD-0C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:01:48 -0500 Original-Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.173]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HAYCh-0004O5-Cm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:01:47 -0500 Original-Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id j3so919172ugf for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 13:01:46 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=tfQ0ydqovpH/tkbfzMb4Fv5uHBTwRpLU/vznRy0yu3JBqICS5SBZVy0hzwvGZOpXol7wyVLyx+xP9MSY4tC/TCYQA60sLTbkNn3l2Rk3TOR0R4TCDNgBiz9fG+EZKCCx9H7GKX2YFOalMHZy3Y79DZ7oKYYd3B1rhd6A0X0cVWs= Original-Received: by 10.67.97.7 with SMTP id z7mr4631249ugl.1169845306366; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 13:01:46 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.67.105.7 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 13:01:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:65499 Archived-At: On 26 Jan 2007 12:35:28 -0500, Chong Yidong wrote: > There is certainly no difficulty for me to > roll a tarball every week if we decide on that. Don't get me wrong. I'm not complaining; I appreciate the effort. Moreover, just being into the pretest stage makes me insanely happy :) > Personally, I > think that at this point, getting 5 years of accumulated crash and > data-corruption bugfixes into users' hands is more important that > scraping through the remaining handful of niggly bugs left in the > code Agreed. Though we need to apply the patch that allows turning print-circle checking off for some files; and also reach a decision regarding the auto-detection of images. /L/e/k/t/u