From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New pretest tarball 22.0.93 Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:22:12 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87hcuia6c4.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1169824959 644 80.91.229.12 (26 Jan 2007 15:22:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 15:22:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Eli Zaretskii" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 26 16:22:28 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HASuK-0003Qo-7H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:22:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HASuJ-0005xR-Mg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:22:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HASu7-0005xH-Vf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:22:15 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HASu6-0005wV-C0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:22:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HASu6-0005wS-58 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:22:14 -0500 Original-Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.173]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HASu5-0003X4-P4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:22:13 -0500 Original-Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id j3so832928ugf for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 07:22:13 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=mLlQAWzZ0yCMSYOfCFlhERyyOHZTfDFckSOR4NxHsE7RItrApyW42Y0fDIJ5I04gbqFOYNNKfhytbMoiZC/spBHNlaZExJEfOgILKQv+PKVrh6wLObMBqRwfoUYjPXlENl/xj8K7akSkaAWj8K6aFZMdrYV7qxG4Wobja+nHWZs= Original-Received: by 10.67.22.7 with SMTP id z7mr4444672ugi.1169824932848; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 07:22:12 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.67.105.7 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 07:22:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:65488 Archived-At: On 1/26/07, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Emacs 21.1 was a major rewrite of the display engine, that's one > reason why it took so long to release. I know, I wasn't a developer back then but I pretested each and every one of these seventeen tarballs (painstakingly downloading them with a 56K modem because I had no working xdelta) :) But I wasn't really trying to establish a comparison. It's just that I love that kind of procrastinating, navel-gazing, idle info collecting. > Emacs 22.1 doesn't come anywhere near that revolution. Sure. And yet, we're already 91 days into the pretest. > No. Well, that's not gonna make things faster ;-) /L/e/k/t/u