From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A question about read syntax and compiled backreferences Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:50:06 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1169556626 13898 80.91.229.12 (23 Jan 2007 12:50:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 12:50:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 23 13:50:23 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H9L6U-0006Rk-Ta for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:50:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H9L6U-0000F6-B5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 07:50:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H9L6H-0000E6-VV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 07:50:10 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H9L6G-0000B2-Kz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 07:50:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H9L6G-0000Am-Ew for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 07:50:08 -0500 Original-Received: from [64.233.182.188] (helo=nf-out-0910.google.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H9L6G-0005Xl-1q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 07:50:08 -0500 Original-Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id h2so221479nfe for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 04:50:07 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ll7UOZeOESH436u/FBCZC6HQYQnVJMCEqBXZiRsgg07sfMvn8g9rg7TJwlLrLCUtXrXN+69iCagSgjWe2ljII820RtqxXcQITfgGWetBHvccG5+pwDfuxXpuCmS7SJDOVQfDT7PKOVbCJIfVi1Ecv37BqUXcPfHixnKKXFeaq0E= Original-Received: by 10.49.8.16 with SMTP id l16mr929387nfi.1169556606730; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 04:50:06 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.67.105.7 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 04:50:06 -0800 (PST) Original-To: "Miles Bader" In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:65405 Archived-At: On 1/23/07, Miles Bader wrote: > The following patch seems to fix this bug; Yes. > I'm not sure if it's OK to > apply or not (is print-circle significantly slower?). Well, even if it is slower is The Right Thing To Do, isn't? Or else we should forbid circular structures while byte-compiling files. /L/e/k/t/u