From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: nt/makefile.w32-in Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 13:35:06 +0100 Message-ID: References: <458A71F9.2050709@gnu.org> <458AFA12.4010700@student.lu.se> <458B0F4C.90909@student.lu.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1166790933 28417 80.91.229.10 (22 Dec 2006 12:35:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 12:35:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, jasonr@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 22 13:35:31 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GxjcV-0000RM-Ui for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 13:35:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GxjcV-00016R-Da for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 07:35:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GxjcD-00012h-6a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 07:35:09 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GxjcC-000123-GW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 07:35:08 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GxjcC-00011t-Aw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 07:35:08 -0500 Original-Received: from [66.249.92.173] (helo=ug-out-1314.google.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GxjcB-0007d0-3W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 07:35:07 -0500 Original-Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id j3so3391844ugf for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 04:35:06 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Zd00thpzuuc/ueRCiTUIH58BzHo0l0GBc0gtzxpak+PgcqJSlKd4cQcjdoK3+Sk2Utexaat5LuL7nIkzcCj+B2YHUyxLp9tnzd4Rf3I53rNtOHq2Jf1OsdzZJdyp4+p/gYF7Ed4/iTxIlMncmUgCLtEcnfyoyPelFf5F32ovPcg= Original-Received: by 10.82.113.6 with SMTP id l6mr214600buc.1166790906200; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 04:35:06 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.82.147.2 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 04:35:06 -0800 (PST) Original-To: "Eli Zaretskii" In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:64108 Archived-At: On 12/22/06, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > It is clear that the file should be reverted to Unix EOLs, Agreed. > but now I'm > unsure what, if anything, should we do before the release. We shouldn't try to fix what's not broken. I'd say let's leave it as is unless pretesters detect any problem with the current situation. The time to change it is after release. /L/e/k/t/u