From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Problems with the url package on w32? Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 23:56:21 +0100 Message-ID: References: <45887987.3040105@student.lu.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1166741799 27687 80.91.229.10 (21 Dec 2006 22:56:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:56:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 21 23:56:38 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GxWq5-00033g-DS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 23:56:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GxWq4-0008CT-Ts for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 17:56:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GxWps-0008CJ-SF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 17:56:24 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GxWpr-0008Bk-Ck for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 17:56:24 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GxWpr-0008Bh-8U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 17:56:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [64.233.182.184] (helo=nf-out-0910.google.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GxWpq-00069U-Rs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 17:56:23 -0500 Original-Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d4so3174352nfe for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 14:56:21 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=K2qCy0bK/+MwtM0QUOIZTc7qVHEtnG7nWKJ1oQCa58bKUxJsriB5ReCDk8bYCX/wTczN7vHdbpX3gMUMaglhDM8um525MQK40mUw//ZMUZiWjzpkCyFNCh0ly7kY2PmLtcPPmXc2BPNg5q8Yemj0YX6a7oZRWNLuzbLFcBwABHM= Original-Received: by 10.82.190.2 with SMTP id n2mr184905buf.1166741781633; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 14:56:21 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.82.147.2 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 14:56:21 -0800 (PST) Original-To: "Stefan Monnier" In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:64073 Archived-At: On 12/21/06, Stefan Monnier wrote: > I.e. C-c C-a fails to apply the hunk (i.e. doesn't change the buffer at > all), and correctly tells the user about this failure? > > If so, it's a "minor" bug. No. C-c C-a says "hunk applied" (something like that) and the hunk is *not* applied. > I'd be interested to learn more about it, so please send me the data next > time you encounter such a case. I'll do. /L/e/k/t/u