From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Problems with the url package on w32? Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 12:06:54 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87wt5825wh.fsf@freemail.hu> <45887987.3040105@student.lu.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1166612841 8660 80.91.229.10 (20 Dec 2006 11:07:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:07:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 20 12:07:20 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GwzI8-0007l2-0u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 12:07:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GwzI7-0004hA-Ei for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 06:07:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GwzHo-0004eQ-OP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 06:07:00 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GwzHk-0004Ww-1a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 06:07:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GwzHj-0004Wm-PG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 06:06:55 -0500 Original-Received: from [64.233.182.188] (helo=nf-out-0910.google.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GwzHj-0006oY-8B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 06:06:55 -0500 Original-Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d4so2613036nfe for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 03:06:54 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=M0T9vUCw2Hyj2RpNv7X1VgfO1bE9pohXOzeUBLI8Vr4ZbhigEyv5YaqF7SzMmKr2gPz3kXL8UvxJny8M01Z9iczJHGfVkqlgV0qn9JHDumCh6taVi6E+GCN6J+cimK1DhIj2CJDHwGr38135HUSUnKsnwKzmlrsYdNHYqc4LhQU= Original-Received: by 10.82.182.8 with SMTP id e8mr1428135buf.1166612814182; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 03:06:54 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.82.147.2 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 03:06:54 -0800 (PST) Original-To: "Eli Zaretskii" In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:63986 Archived-At: On 12/20/06, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > What I do is simpler: set the region around the diffs in the email > buffer, and then type these commands: I assume you read e-mail from within Emacs. I never do that. > I was replying to your message where you seemed to imply that running > Patch from within Emacs is inherently unstable or unreliable. I talked of "apply[ing] a patch from inside Emacs", which could be understood as referring to running an external patch, but I also talked of "get[ting] 'hunk applied' messages". For the record, what I'm saying is that `diff-apply-hunk' is unreliable. /L/e/k/t/u