From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Problems with the url package on w32? Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 00:54:00 +0100 Message-ID: References: <871wnnclkz.fsf@freemail.hu> <87lkltztzy.fsf@freemail.hu> <871wniv89d.fsf@freemail.hu> <87wt5825wh.fsf@freemail.hu> <45887987.3040105@student.lu.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1166572740 29215 80.91.229.10 (19 Dec 2006 23:59:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 23:59:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 20 00:58:59 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GworB-0005nS-45 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 00:58:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GworA-00070W-8D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:58:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gwoqy-0006zV-T6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:58:36 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gwoqy-0006yn-GL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:58:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gwoqy-0006yh-4f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:58:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [64.233.182.184] (helo=nf-out-0910.google.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Gwomh-0000SO-IO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:54:11 -0500 Original-Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d4so2445588nfe for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:54:11 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=aVJK0V4rwenPG2CzCCyunt01PBOBH/asDrxuhzXkBj2Set+svtFhPjHfhRpK8NFzLKQvulDIxIVY8R41HLGC5Sl8yWzjYGbGURXePXgW2bM+sEfBbf65CTdDKLTe0EkR90GjAoZPqtb3jrlLBlwS4+Z3feQtSHOhkBU3iRMHP4o= Original-Received: by 10.82.118.2 with SMTP id q2mr1308530buc.1166572451030; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:54:11 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.82.147.2 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:54:00 -0800 (PST) Original-To: "Lennart Borgman" In-Reply-To: <45887987.3040105@student.lu.se> Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:63972 Archived-At: On 12/20/06, Lennart Borgman wrote: > There seem to be a bug here on some level. Has anyone else seen this? I never apply a patch from inside Emacs. When the patch is not kosher (spaces changed by your e-mail program, crlf/lf issues, etc.) it is perfectly possible to get "hunk applied" messages for hunks that weren't really applied. /L/e/k/t/u