From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: -DVERSION for emacsclient Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 14:25:57 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1164461199 29501 80.91.229.2 (25 Nov 2006 13:26:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 13:26:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 25 14:26:36 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GnxXw-0001LN-4w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 14:26:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GnxXv-00047n-K0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 08:26:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GnxXe-00045q-Az for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 08:26:02 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GnxXa-00042V-VX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 08:26:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GnxXa-00042B-Os for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 08:25:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [64.233.166.178] (helo=py-out-1112.google.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GnxXa-0005EL-Il for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 08:25:58 -0500 Original-Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a78so763185pyh for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 05:25:58 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=OiSkg/RgYDc6oUH8rYN3J5pn7eOs9J8mE1eZy9peB5uBFTeQ7m7W4fOjUCQhyGnUaef06T/yrZWqmeFrOBNIH/H9R5kkdA9U5ExJf0mYIYnZmWmCx0QTnGx86CEXjReFJPTgsPpAIIK86Kmd9nIWalD82mfu9MDndoOT+wqOTsE= Original-Received: by 10.35.38.17 with SMTP id q17mr8276080pyj.1164461157813; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 05:25:57 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.35.95.18 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 05:25:57 -0800 (PST) Original-To: "Eli Zaretskii" In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:62792 Archived-At: On 11/25/06, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Do you mean the modified makefile.w32-in are intended to be checked > into CVS? Yes. How is that different from nt/emacs.rc or man/emacs.texi, which are checked into CVS with the current version number? /L/e/k/t/u