From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: message's docstring Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 13:08:21 +0100 Message-ID: References: <85r6w9ynpl.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1163333332 9613 80.91.229.2 (12 Nov 2006 12:08:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 12:08:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs- devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 12 13:08:49 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GjE8l-0006RL-VC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 13:08:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GjE8l-0007m2-GA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 07:08:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GjE8Z-0007lb-Op for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 07:08:35 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GjE8Z-0007lO-5W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 07:08:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GjE8Z-0007lF-0b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 07:08:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [64.233.166.179] (helo=py-out-1112.google.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GjE8Y-0003vY-PD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 07:08:34 -0500 Original-Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id p76so569215pyb for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 04:08:31 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=F1qKByNPsjhisd9PUBXqI8hZz1LafdD70GUIndD9iogf+K2pOROSMVsXocmEFBYqY2tN6wfvVZoSJhjVar9+Nom/rZbE6LHyX3DJIANkYQEdjOmHNk3sJHZvFCzHveGg/1XPx64TPKQXvTwOWhTSGRbrQFedCC7n7eIXOLy39cY= Original-Received: by 10.35.48.15 with SMTP id a15mr7813884pyk.1163333301955; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 04:08:21 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.35.95.18 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 04:08:21 -0800 (PST) Original-To: "David Kastrup" In-Reply-To: <85r6w9ynpl.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:62108 Archived-At: On 11/12/06, David Kastrup wrote: > That sounds nonsensical. Shouldn't this be > (y-or-n-p (format ...)) > instead? Surely yes. But the fact that it did work till now is because message returns the message string. So, either we document it, or document that the result is irrelevant (but it certainly doesn't look so, looking at the code). /L/e/k/t/u