* defconst -> risky-local-variable
@ 2006-11-06 10:10 Juanma Barranquero
2006-11-06 21:00 ` Richard Stallman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Juanma Barranquero @ 2006-11-06 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
Shouldn't the docs for `defconst' mention (either in the docstring,
the Emacs Lisp Reference, or both) that it sets the SYMBOL's
risky-local-variable property to t?
--
/L/e/k/t/u
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: defconst -> risky-local-variable 2006-11-06 10:10 defconst -> risky-local-variable Juanma Barranquero @ 2006-11-06 21:00 ` Richard Stallman 2006-11-06 22:14 ` Juanma Barranquero 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Richard Stallman @ 2006-11-06 21:00 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: emacs-devel Shouldn't the docs for `defconst' mention (either in the docstring, the Emacs Lisp Reference, or both) that it sets the SYMBOL's risky-local-variable property to t? No, that is an implementation detail. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: defconst -> risky-local-variable 2006-11-06 21:00 ` Richard Stallman @ 2006-11-06 22:14 ` Juanma Barranquero 2006-11-08 4:17 ` Richard Stallman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Juanma Barranquero @ 2006-11-06 22:14 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: emacs-devel On 11/6/06, Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> wrote: >> that it sets the SYMBOL's risky-local-variable property to t? > No, that is an implementation detail. Curious. In general, risky-local-variable is a feature, not an implementation detail; and setting risky-local-variable for a defconst isn't really necessary (implementation-wise). So I guess I don't understand the rationale. /L/e/k/t/u ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: defconst -> risky-local-variable 2006-11-06 22:14 ` Juanma Barranquero @ 2006-11-08 4:17 ` Richard Stallman 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Richard Stallman @ 2006-11-08 4:17 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: emacs-devel Curious. In general, risky-local-variable is a feature, not an implementation detail; and setting risky-local-variable for a defconst isn't really necessary (implementation-wise). So I guess I don't understand the rationale. We don't need to document all the details of what might put on that property. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-11-08 4:17 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2006-11-06 10:10 defconst -> risky-local-variable Juanma Barranquero 2006-11-06 21:00 ` Richard Stallman 2006-11-06 22:14 ` Juanma Barranquero 2006-11-08 4:17 ` Richard Stallman
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).