From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: dirtrack-toggle () vs. shell-dirtrack-mode (&optional arg) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 19:51:44 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1147974747 3733 80.91.229.2 (18 May 2006 17:52:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 17:52:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 18 19:52:26 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FgmfO-0001uY-PQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 May 2006 19:52:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FgmfO-00078p-6T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 May 2006 13:52:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fgmf6-00077x-4C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 May 2006 13:51:48 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fgmf3-00075r-EM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 May 2006 13:51:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fgmf3-00075Z-1E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 May 2006 13:51:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [64.233.162.205] (helo=nz-out-0102.google.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FgmiB-00032v-Ey for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 May 2006 13:54:59 -0400 Original-Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i1so446770nzh for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 10:51:44 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=l7kxWE8nA3NR6JxgPRC7qIzALYQ7ataWmWo/bbG6E6330ucH0rm1e1bUdcodpRl1iL7SYTdd3ymcTeFvgXbibqvoZODK2N7yCBEy38PvbgJnrx7nRejOMesLtXeKV6vV+fC7h4oUpef841VxI2SejZVXYiPQV6xeA0SncX/M62Y= Original-Received: by 10.37.21.57 with SMTP id y57mr818452nzi; Thu, 18 May 2006 10:51:44 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.37.13.8 with HTTP; Thu, 18 May 2006 10:51:44 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: "Stefan Monnier" In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:54713 Archived-At: On 5/18/06, Stefan Monnier wrote: > I think the problem is that we have two definitions. Certainly, having a name that can be either a function, or an alias to another function (in another module), seems prone to cause confusion sooner or later... --=20 /L/e/k/t/u