From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: version comparison functions Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 00:36:19 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1125095996 389 80.91.229.2 (26 Aug 2005 22:39:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 22:39:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 27 00:39:49 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E8mqS-0000i1-Lf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 00:38:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E8muP-0002z5-Jb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 18:42:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E8mtM-0002iu-4c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 18:41:44 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E8mtI-0002h3-LS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 18:41:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E8mtH-0002g6-Hi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 18:41:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [64.233.182.205] (helo=nproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1E8mpi-0005PL-IG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 18:37:58 -0400 Original-Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x37so210139nfc for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 15:36:19 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=q2RUZRfW+boXVLf0qXll0vT/FzFlOVOPvMfEbc2cdWyXAuAjEtNrggg0OJIF/CN+TQLOy/DVk9uS1yCCFTec6fHnpKJVBZUnpLinG/7pagqgr2Pe13WlAyoj2Md1D+V2hrWN50gLeMWLH3tQ1V0MgnlbxAULRT5y4nWogKTrZPQ= Original-Received: by 10.48.3.15 with SMTP id 15mr187447nfc; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 15:36:19 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.48.42.13 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 15:36:19 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: Stefan Monnier In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:42437 Archived-At: On 8/26/05, Stefan Monnier wrote: > How often does that happen? > And for those rare cases where some piece of elisp code uses a version > comparison, how many of those could advantageously use > a feature-test instead? I thought we'd discussed and rejected such versi= on > comparison functions in the past. Yeah. That was my point, too. --=20 /L/e/k/t/u