From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *" Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:52:24 +0200 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Juanma Barranquero NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1122631859 15112 80.91.229.2 (29 Jul 2005 10:10:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:10:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 29 12:10:57 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DyRog-0004fv-RQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:10:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DyRrB-0006wW-Bc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 06:12:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DyRj5-0004sg-49 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 06:04:23 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DyRj0-0004qX-L4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 06:04:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DyRiz-0004gX-PU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 06:04:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [64.233.182.194] (helo=nproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DyRiu-0000KF-6f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 06:04:12 -0400 Original-Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id b2so151281nfe for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:52:24 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=V3+uphXgO2aE6pz9MHwHBVQ2obYzPdvMAyyuUj2hWrbsem3yPLYlroYR6IMLE2Wcc+/CfSOz52kHOh0AbiCYT/j0JyAZT1zd4iTIFggyNN1Qzg6mlwvmi/wq5XBSvyi/nXREb539jqlCMvhJN/tW8fntGODW28qVW6jqY6iij7k= Original-Received: by 10.48.250.16 with SMTP id x16mr100930nfh; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:52:24 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.48.250.5 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:52:24 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: Miles Bader In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:41299 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:41299 On 7/29/05, Miles Bader wrote: > I don't know. It doesn't matter. If there are bugs, they should be > fixed, but delaying the merge won't help anything. I wasn't suggesting delaying the merge in case it didn't build on Windows. I asked out of curiosity, to check it out and try it. --=20 /L/e/k/t/u