From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 21.4 and GCC 3.4.2 Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 15:20:08 +0200 Message-ID: References: <3BD964BFBD32F743B1F738A249368ABD0181C89C@nh2mail01.in.bosch.com> <42D3C218.2080002@gnu.org> Reply-To: Juanma Barranquero NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1121174753 19750 80.91.229.2 (12 Jul 2005 13:25:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 13:25:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Dhruva Krishnamurthy \(RBIN/EDI3\) *" , Emacs Devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 12 15:25:45 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DsKlW-0006XT-8h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 15:25:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DsKn9-0005T2-41 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 09:27:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DsKmO-0005RK-4q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 09:26:32 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DsKmB-0005Lj-Vr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 09:26:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DsKm8-0005Ek-N3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 09:26:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [64.233.182.195] (helo=nproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DsKno-0006AX-5S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 09:28:00 -0400 Original-Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i2so277071nfe for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 06:20:08 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=dJntnmrQLfiyfdV51XkgULIeRhet0Pjci50b1jPItazjHlHRo+1yby5FIyY3TjEkS8UIp9GjcDpAfA+1gPui/l5Q0q4hiwrEm8RjTMMeisBVBMTXMKDf3AdS+6YbzcDFW/luhNztVA2sfikjERSzbP/Ij1xGnKoNUVEtKIBvfVY= Original-Received: by 10.48.240.16 with SMTP id n16mr187996nfh; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 06:20:08 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.48.250.5 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 06:20:08 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: Jason Rumney In-Reply-To: <42D3C218.2080002@gnu.org> Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:40832 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:40832 On 7/12/05, Jason Rumney wrote: > They don't, which is why there is no binary release of 21.4. In the past, releases of Emacs for Windows built with MSVC were made (I even seem to remember they alternated with GCC/MinGW builds). Is there a policy to not do that again? > There has > been code in the EMACS_21_1_RC branch to make them work together since > shortly after 21.3 was released and this problem discovered, but 21.4 > was not made from CVS. 21.4 was released while I was afar. I assumed 21.4 came from the EMACS_21_1_RC branch. Weird to know it wasn't so, and even weirder to know we did a security release and didn't provide a binary for it :-) Thanks for the update, /L/e/k/t/u