From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Incorrect indentation after :name Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 11:29:28 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87mzozfh6w.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> Reply-To: Juanma Barranquero NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1121076722 29082 80.91.229.2 (11 Jul 2005 10:12:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 10:12:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 11 12:11:54 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DrvGN-0008Bi-JZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 12:11:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DrvHw-0003jo-11 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 06:13:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Drv3C-0008Oa-Ox for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 05:58:11 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Drv39-0008OE-WD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 05:58:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DruzA-0007Qc-Fe for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 05:54:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [64.233.182.199] (helo=nproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Druim-0005qo-B6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 05:37:04 -0400 Original-Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id h2so194397nfe for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 02:29:28 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=EVFUilNHJc/5um0p67XjU3p2KQHLtGE2Cd0XaM+9nDzgX0O9vOWryQKnuyDeyzzBrgksSJ3rikwGUSOBwOiIXcY8uNhunb2AYQHibz7KeIFUwDx0sC6mPVzGxLtxD6Ig9fGu5/UpZFupZqFH5LsktWl5FK0frBgp9oYnwTjOFuA= Original-Received: by 10.48.4.10 with SMTP id 10mr130847nfd; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 02:29:28 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.48.250.5 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 02:29:28 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:40768 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:40768 On 7/8/05, Richard M. Stallman wrote: > I am not sure which of the two you are preferring. However, I can > state that the first pattern above is the way Emacs is supposed to > indent an if expression. That's the one I prefer (the first one). > This is not going to be changed--please let's not spend time talking > about such a change. I was not talking about such a change. Someone else was talking about making a change which would not affect elisp `if's, but would have the side effect that Common Lisp `if's edited with `lisp-indent-function' set to `common-lisp-indent-function' would indent like the elisp `if's, instead of both the THEN and ELSE parts at the same indentation depth as they currently do. Apparently, Lawrence Mitchell didn't like that. I was merely stating that I think the Emacs way to indent `if' seems *much* better to me even for Common Lisp `if's. --=20 /L/e/k/t/u