From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Editing exportet registry files Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2005 16:33:56 +0200 Message-ID: References: <42C45594.9090207@iue.tuwien.ac.at> <1120201971.42c4ecf37e342@l01.iue.tuwien.ac.at> <85vf3ul8sj.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: Juanma Barranquero NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1120317136 7796 80.91.229.2 (2 Jul 2005 15:12:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2005 15:12:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 02 17:12:14 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dojf4-0007R1-6x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2005 17:12:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DojY0-0002Ip-Ai for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2005 11:04:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DojTU-0001LL-Ab for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2005 11:00:09 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DojOq-0008VI-Gz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2005 10:55:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DojOk-0008Mj-3l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2005 10:55:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [64.233.182.200] (helo=nproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Doj9V-0004I6-61 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2005 10:39:29 -0400 Original-Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i2so105199nfe for ; Sat, 02 Jul 2005 07:33:56 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=p3LtX3W9l175xefAv28IYBlyvJ1QSaY1i7SDSvhj4rPY6oTwBu9KBaQxP2pQLfj9U/uUrKSVCO2zo1VGGJUCljCR4ayU+pCiJK+lnAYUQzIuKBe9VmdfsXZoCFtzHy4IY3GsbE/4Ia4Kbr8jyoD2Ag6GGSLV3Xvp9Shnk8cBWFY= Original-Received: by 10.48.240.16 with SMTP id n16mr71221nfh; Sat, 02 Jul 2005 07:33:56 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.48.250.5 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Jul 2005 07:33:56 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: Andreas Schwab In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:40120 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:40120 On 7/2/05, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Juanma Barranquero writes: > Among the 8-bit encodings supported by glibc there are IMHO no encodings > which have a significant probability of being misdetected as UTF-16. Well, if you're right that would settle the issue, wouldn't it? Propose it changed and let people opine. --=20 /L/e/k/t/u