From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: argument names for define-obsolete-*-alias Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 02:16:54 +0200 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Juanma Barranquero NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1118709511 6762 80.91.229.2 (14 Jun 2005 00:38:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 00:38:31 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 14 02:38:28 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DhzRM-0006x9-Jy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 02:38:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DhzWG-0000zM-8Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:43:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DhzQ5-00061b-SL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:36:46 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DhzPr-0005tW-1Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:36:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DhzPq-0005qt-F5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:36:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [64.233.182.198] (helo=nproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Dhz83-0001GB-Sy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:18:08 -0400 Original-Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i2so111529nfe for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 17:16:54 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=RwlzA2HFj6k5FLP8kQ/ZQrVxcWtMH0/CVIriAR0OMq98KHTN7kLGkVXmt81n4pQw3tAuOoZPF8vySfv1Ur2jL2+EuyiQy+5uw1UoFb1OoX5hjwJvDQhFRKh4sGmUhnnUae4j9cLtZTnPso2m8Y2X6yhfGuoGdTkpgazpmQk3sQE= Original-Received: by 10.48.249.11 with SMTP id w11mr87133nfh; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 17:16:54 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.48.250.5 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 17:16:54 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:38771 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:38771 > I can see how this could be confusing. I suggest using names > OLD-OBSOLETE-NAME and CURRENT-RECOMMENDED-NAME. I like these, but they are a bit too long for docstrings, etc. Wouldn't just OBSOLETE-NAME and RECOMMENDED-NAME (or CURRENT-NAME) suffice? --=20 /L/e/k/t/u