From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MS Windows Frame Maximize in .emacs (again) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 10:39:03 +0200 Message-ID: References: <42A793B8.3020609@student.lu.se> <1118304946.42a7fab2cecb9@webmail.freedom2surf.net> Reply-To: Juanma Barranquero NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1118313025 30899 80.91.229.6 (9 Jun 2005 10:30:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 10:30:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 09 12:30:14 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1DgJKl-0001bQ-00 for ; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 11:28:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DgJRf-0005jB-3v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 05:35:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DgJ06-0002yd-Dc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 05:06:58 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DgIpA-00021O-2E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 04:55:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DgIkl-0001ph-OF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 04:51:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [64.233.182.192] (helo=nproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DgIZC-0003XN-W7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 04:39:11 -0400 Original-Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id d4so2886nfe for ; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 01:39:03 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ks+lSwet20UzwvGmsgql34DK7c+4ez6F8Uu+8D22ofJd8T2f6Yz1HApXMoAhqQ66OmbYdVYlzoj34SqhnLO7MerI7txvHOKrCmT+rT53IuEDmlnVixw2cBdazx+YHqzpVulxKOSDBfTqatvX5pOWqbpTT0NXF8F6X+Dh600jkeY= Original-Received: by 10.48.240.15 with SMTP id n15mr5300nfh; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 01:39:03 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.48.250.5 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 01:39:03 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: "jasonr@f2s.com" In-Reply-To: <1118304946.42a7fab2cecb9@webmail.freedom2surf.net> Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:38419 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:38419 > The "bug" used to be there because Emacs required an integer number of li= nes on > the screen. Now that Emacs handles different sized fonts, this restrictio= n may > not be needed anymore, in which case we should remove it completely on al= l > platforms, not just for maximized frames on Windows. Sure. Still, maximized frames on Windows have their own problems. I have a custom function which uses w32-send-sys-command to maximize the frame and I've been unable to make it work reliably (oftentimes Windows and Emacs seem to differ about whether the Emacs frame is maximized or not). > But I am not convinced > that scrolling code and other code that works with "pages" has been adapt= ed to > work with non inteeger numbers of lines measured in the default font yet. What can we try to test that hypothesis? --=20 /L/e/k/t/u