From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [rant] Should reverting a buffer really discard undo history? Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 23:56:29 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87ll5w5vxa.fsf@wigwam.deepwood.net> <874qck8ky7.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> Reply-To: Juanma Barranquero NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1117491631 32552 80.91.229.2 (30 May 2005 22:20:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 22:20:31 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 31 00:20:29 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dcsbp-0005sJ-Pf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 May 2005 00:19:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dcsgn-0000rW-Hy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 May 2005 18:24:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dcsej-00005A-J9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2005 18:22:45 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DcsdB-00084w-N6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2005 18:21:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dcsd8-0007hq-NC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2005 18:21:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [64.233.184.199] (helo=wproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DcsGx-0001vo-0o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2005 17:58:11 -0400 Original-Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 50so1663365wri for ; Mon, 30 May 2005 14:56:29 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=SPiroNFV61Ir71AdmdxER4xiBq8pnkbyWjGFGbq4TV0dMTgvuwLsIr6qA71i6JaxlfKqRZjFRnFbFOXldDh91i8rVpkyvW4oJatmYX1EHcySJYCMz2FYbxhFpuL4hiaLoNOk5yhM9DIwymu9YOIxSL8bHJ1+kB42tjpHeRMyyEw= Original-Received: by 10.54.23.26 with SMTP id 26mr2777136wrw; Mon, 30 May 2005 14:56:29 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.54.82.6 with HTTP; Mon, 30 May 2005 14:56:29 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <874qck8ky7.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:37908 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:37908 > Maybe having it as a (potentially buffer-local) option is a good idea. >=20 > What do people think? Anything simple to implement and that offers increased safety for the user's data is good in my book. --=20 /L/e/k/t/u