From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A few issues with thumbs.el Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 17:08:14 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87br6zuerw.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <87u0kqrsur.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <87hdgon2p2.fsf@jurta.org> Reply-To: Juanma Barranquero NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1117379471 31143 80.91.229.2 (29 May 2005 15:11:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 15:11:11 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 29 17:11:09 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DcPR2-00071r-6s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 May 2005 17:10:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DcPVj-0000dw-CC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 May 2005 11:15:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DcPVB-0000Wl-Q9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 May 2005 11:14:58 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DcPV6-0000Su-Gq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 May 2005 11:14:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DcPV4-0000Qt-Jt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 May 2005 11:14:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [64.233.184.193] (helo=wproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DcPQ1-0004AF-JT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 May 2005 11:09:37 -0400 Original-Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 50so1354823wri for ; Sun, 29 May 2005 08:08:14 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Of+sus6qUDTUiaWSdJg5FkoS/KDoXk1BRDulFylB+q4orhu48GMTZRl0TUWQljhWaHr5eIPJTO0wo9GjHwEU5hpeLqxYl2wjdzNad7d0x6ykkCLHNWOltSeL2LFiceRqbEm6h3cggc7BYsy99+ILHR28R9G5nor1ql9UYMK88+U= Original-Received: by 10.54.35.72 with SMTP id i72mr2328903wri; Sun, 29 May 2005 08:08:14 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.54.82.6 with HTTP; Sun, 29 May 2005 08:08:14 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:37856 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:37856 > In general, the only time something is really not visible to users > is when it is internal to one program. I suppose that is one way to see it, yes. But using md5 or other checksum/hash ways to encode names of temporary files is hardly new (though I suppose you'll say it is not new, but it *is* wrong nonetheless :) But the point is moot. Does anyone object to the version of thumbs-thumbname I proposed a few messages ago, where the resulting filename is very much like the one it generates now, but valid and with a sxhash checksum added to it to make collisions less likely? --=20 /L/e/k/t/u