From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Incompatible change without warning Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 01:17:20 +0200 Message-ID: References: <17027.30024.418184.567765@chls068.ch.intel.com> <17034.42710.151931.874355@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <17035.61580.568515.598030@farnswood.snap.net.nz> Reply-To: Juanma Barranquero NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1116545169 2155 80.91.229.2 (19 May 2005 23:26:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 23:26:09 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 20 01:26:07 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DYuOB-0004M3-3E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 May 2005 01:25:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DYuQt-0003Tm-Ma for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 May 2005 19:28:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DYuLY-0007QU-J6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 May 2005 19:22:33 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DYuLU-0007Nk-NJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 May 2005 19:22:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DYuLT-0007Fs-DN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 May 2005 19:22:28 -0400 Original-Received: from [64.233.184.204] (helo=wproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DYuOr-0005yd-5E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 May 2005 19:25:57 -0400 Original-Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 50so934403wri for ; Thu, 19 May 2005 16:17:20 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ky/LWeN1tmpIZMRCLuvRRwG99bNutyiQTfAlDfryEubdFQjZn58L/L3pw12S/RpZ8kc3A5rOQwTbujxOYrBJ50QDs07bCdAEmZvirzu9z86erNChpTl90ux27G8adbKsuIdmfOS6drwvYADDpOU816gTCdSj8GWrounx7NAtfng= Original-Received: by 10.54.10.72 with SMTP id 72mr1282169wrj; Thu, 19 May 2005 16:17:20 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.54.82.6 with HTTP; Thu, 19 May 2005 16:17:20 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:37371 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:37371 On 5/20/05, Richard Stallman wrote: > Please put the definition of unfocus-frame back in. > It should not be removed in this release. OK, no problem. > You mustn't presume such a thing. Eh, don't shoot the messenger. I *didn't* remove unfocus-frame, I was just talking about what I suppose was the frame of mind of the person who did it :) --=20 /L/e/k/t/u