From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CL function's docstrings Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 10:09:54 +0200 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Juanma Barranquero NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1116428603 31518 80.91.229.2 (18 May 2005 15:03:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 15:03:23 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 18 17:03:21 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DYQ3Z-0000aP-Fn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 May 2005 17:01:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DYQ61-0000lm-E4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 May 2005 11:04:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DYJio-0004py-Jh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2005 04:16:08 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DYJhW-0004m2-6Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2005 04:14:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DYJed-0003so-Qc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2005 04:11:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [64.233.184.200] (helo=wproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DYJkn-0001S4-16 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2005 04:18:09 -0400 Original-Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 50so108881wri for ; Wed, 18 May 2005 01:09:55 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=i/gWr/cJEmOOvc4WP4/JLJhvvzQAIfKq/LdL0EaET1MfSb/L2Qz8aQE0+MHemR6cMY13ZecCF3Xwu+H963+9CdKeiIL8Wu8BzS2ebrtSpwX5erQi3X4QsCml42Xts/xeYmeoQ9Vtnf6GeznmikoxqMh4WQnQioIWzaZfC8kIbMk= Original-Received: by 10.54.37.78 with SMTP id k78mr165347wrk; Wed, 18 May 2005 01:09:54 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.54.82.6 with HTTP; Wed, 18 May 2005 01:09:54 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:37262 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:37262 > How about if you do whatever is best so as to use the best possible names > in each function? OK. That's even better. assuming there's no interest in maintaining absolute argument-name consistency between functions (which doesn't exist now, to be fair). --=20 /L/e/k/t/u