From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs's set-frame-size can not work well with gnome-shell? Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 10:09:11 +0100 Message-ID: References: <6a08dc66.3510.16fcc47e442.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="37920"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: tumashu , Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 22 10:12:09 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iuC3V-0009pk-Mk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 10:12:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38840 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iuC3U-0006LS-Ia for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 04:12:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50111) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iuC0j-0004u7-Dy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 04:09:18 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iuC0i-0008U5-9h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 04:09:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:56375) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iuC0i-0008Tl-0h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 04:09:16 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1579684152; bh=o1XM+Z94GwfSQNqga7wTTTl6zGqO9Tu9kH/ZTUQswuY=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=HW2M8tKefK3iQsKvb31kBh4m6gzoJ9JJNjPBJDeqjlHD43LMDWoFYw8qkEPaCzog5 TXTksv7b7HVqdYUQFRrbCOImV21S7j2sKC8981YFvSkAHJ43fVtGjkAmlgCIubTFbh 8iTCziU1TBuXk3x6rOQcQVMc493yIX53FdnHkIak= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([46.125.249.39]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N3bSj-1jdG0Z1OdP-010d43; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 10:09:12 +0100 In-Reply-To: <6a08dc66.3510.16fcc47e442.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:+wjvMk3e71dp86dokjQe+Ofx0V6ErfpBO/i/VYcREJEl38h/m2X ZSCsa0zZpLo4ZZCJbS3/7GZCWpc57oPewdSpkGvlJ/DULCyCI+ib5rvnJNlnFWww35ziwBC vA4BUXBlFotI8/ojZcGPhf5rKJ9FbIwj6beWS81q8XZUTxMGpEwcTmfGircYrOawHL+1dJl YUJVc1Zyt13JlcCKod4GA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:TkfYIk6X6J8=:ILSFyJ/PS0U6v6q2fe7G+0 9tzx4Ds1lo52DOXsPpTXhY1QBywN4JO1si2xq7XxLEK2pg2VLGsBpaMDkw5MzcMWWgZ6LgPnv MOeC2TkLqFO2yNBV/qNgB9D1ks7BiE6BCeRxulix2z/ahyRFUP9XlLzcS3ERrJLwrXUQd4g44 /JaXc9L6zyFOMllIjuAPJSeTN1iXKDHpuh3fqYBT6BS0ER7c/J8hSPf2xB9DZd2MKzBhyrnTl tROWjumLHQbdkKaJDs92968rI863YPmPdYS6oFvrj9tyb5C80BaaT8L7kowU8toJBQfYcT4mE JJ4P4FHbpJH5qK8MQUQ4ATlDFfnJ/GmhZZI+sP6SFNy7Gg70CZ6+bRQLs0gQcCdvOgsBfnCzG FAAvUYJgmYxs4WQ6hPNaJmp/M1iVtCE/apX+lBp5uEH8G7IBz6n2OupI4xtLIPDPJ+WKDjbja tTxWH3DEDyQLCPGqPQwWnhWMmF2izOuj3CCj/aqVU/rj6ZGDlvVtyNrIsCv7qFJ/mRMqFRMTU wnDRhxJQYPez40FJj0vciY2o4Z7kVTVDMpLTh9ilVjgnpkMNcNMoB2SZpWxw1m1Q2dgPOTdcn A9gGttyWnQZgKHZd1LBJ3nZ2rqk6wjOeGxy6uSxMLNYlAaMBDiuF5PGvp3om6fBg2rDDadcDJ dAvXwBNeWoxOqNh8pDVY4q4JNIqRoKdzgNyuDkRZ29EyzxESaX4mPDZ1g7j7JP3Z6cVYOfbrY 9OJeLl7alP6mIWE03UqIcMG0kFvEPsIA6rdqyqyfeu9iyJOKgR5uwosn5rFvSyTIeGikubIM X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.19 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:244489 Archived-At: > Today I test lucid emacs again, maybe the slowness is posn-at-point > > (benchmark 1000 '(posn-at-point (point))) > > "Elapsed time: 0.684959s" > > for posframe call posn-at-point And what do you get for a GTK build? Here I get in an O3 GTK build Elapsed time: 0.590930s (0.175256s in 3 GCs) in an O0 GTK build Elapsed time: 2.644455s (0.764866s in 4 GCs) in an O0 Lucid build Elapsed time: 2.785499s (0.776188s in 4 GCs) martin