From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bzr: conflicting tags: mh-e-doc-8.3 Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 13:57:53 -0400 Message-ID: References: <75k49315wb.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83wrd3rttk.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1316541483 27099 80.91.229.12 (20 Sep 2011 17:58:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:58:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 20 19:57:59 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R64Zz-0006Fv-9S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 19:57:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56212 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R64Zy-000137-Fl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 13:57:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:37603) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R64Zv-00012h-ND for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 13:57:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R64Zu-00005G-Oq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 13:57:55 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:55584) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R64Zu-00005C-M9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 13:57:54 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R64Zt-0004QT-Uj; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 13:57:53 -0400 X-Spook: 64 Vauxhall Cross bce cryptanalysis Lon Horiuchi United X-Ran: 3$B%Dap~68,Pvh-D!p'^2K@b2kn)kQv8=:~m;4d1p49F/|l|?M1OV'X35*bSGuf>+C)gUz X-Hue: green X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <83wrd3rttk.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 20 Sep 2011 20:45:43 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:144125 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: > FWIW, I didn't have any such conflicts when I updated an hour or so > ago. Maybe I did something to end up in this state, I don't know. I've just been bzr pulling every day. For me, r104749 and r105851 both had a tag "mh-e-doc-8.3". http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-diffs/2011-06/msg00311.html does not show a "tags" entry though. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-diffs/2011-09/msg00237.html does.