From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: uptime.el Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:35:37 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87lk5ppxj4.fsf@jurta.org> <8g4pcb9aen.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87ir0rcknh.fsf@jurta.org> <6izlu23aw5.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <878x1l690b.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1203132950 18609 80.91.229.12 (16 Feb 2008 03:35:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 03:35:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rocher@member.fsf.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 16 04:36:13 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JQDqX-0006dV-Jt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 04:36:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JQDq2-0000PH-Tm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:35:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JQDpz-0000OZ-7D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:35:39 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JQDpy-0000OD-46 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:35:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JQDpy-0000OA-1L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:35:38 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JQDpx-0005PN-RW; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:35:37 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JQDpx-0001qj-AM; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:35:37 -0500 X-Spook: Taiwan Ft. Bragg Afghanistan TELINT Fortezza Rumsfeld X-Ran: ?Yf.xM++i`tik[_KQBW)~_weoU`P+7]ifH[o(d:aqnU!KKy9B!3W@9gc2-rGEH)!BHpn=j X-Hue: white X-Attribution: GM User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:89215 Archived-At: Juri Linkov wrote: > Maybe emacs-init-time (for both the variable and command names > to reduce confusion). I was actually thinking it might be good to rename emacs-startup-time to before-init-time, and add after-init-time (consistent with before-init-hook etc). I think it would be confusing for -time to mean both a time and an interval. > But do you expect an instance of Emacs to run years (as can be reported > by emacs-uptime :)? Why not? That was a deliberate piece of optimism! :)