From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Perry E. Metzger" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 11:12:14 -0400 Message-ID: References: <8735rzyzbz.fsf@163.com> <86v94v3xh9.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <87o8amy88o.fsf@163.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39283"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.0 To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 28 17:13:02 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m8lF0-0009xv-E9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 17:13:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36590 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m8lEz-00062B-EE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 11:13:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42426) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m8lEH-0004gy-2t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 11:12:17 -0400 Original-Received: from hacklheber.piermont.com ([2001:470:30:84:e276:63ff:fe62:3400]:58804) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m8lEF-0005DC-Dm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 11:12:16 -0400 Original-Received: from snark.cb.piermont.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hacklheber.piermont.com (Postfix) with UTF8SMTP id AD64A25F for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 11:12:14 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from [10.160.2.107] (jabberwock.cb.piermont.com [10.160.2.107]) by snark.cb.piermont.com (Postfix) with UTF8SMTP id 7F3EF2DE892 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 11:12:14 -0400 (EDT) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <87o8amy88o.fsf@163.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:470:30:84:e276:63ff:fe62:3400; envelope-from=perry@piermont.com; helo=hacklheber.piermont.com X-Spam_score_int: -21 X-Spam_score: -2.2 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.277, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:271753 Archived-At: On 7/28/21 07:43, Andrei Kuznetsov wrote: > Stephen Leake writes: > >> Some of the tree-sitter development tools are implemented in Rust; you >> only need Rust if you are developing/fixing a grammar for a language. > If I understand this correctly, it means one would require the Rust > toolchain to support new languages in tree-sitter, or to improve > existing support. That's not true. Tree Sitter is not written even partially in Rust. It does have Rust bindings for people who use Rust. Perry