unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Concurrency has landed
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 17:51:45 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <eea2eab4-c0c8-aeaa-ec49-a399449cd68e@cs.ucla.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jwvpokib1ax.fsf-monnier+gmane.emacs.devel@gnu.org>

Stefan Monnier wrote:
> I really
> can't imagine an architecture where "p1 - p2" is valid C code (i.e. both
> p1 and p2 point inside the same object) and works before `free` yet it
> doesn't give the same answer after `free`.

That's not what the code in question does. p1 addresses a newly allocated 
object, and p2 is a dangling pointer that addresses the old (freed) object.

The problem with -fcheck-pointer-bounds does not occur when the program computes 
p1 - p2, as the program still gets a valid integer. The problem occurs later, 
when Emacs computes q + (p1 - p2), where q is a dangling pointer into the old 
object. On conventional architectures this has the same value as (q - p2) + p1, 
but that's not true with -fcheck-pointer-bounds, which attaches q's bounds 
(which are now invalid) to the resulting pointer.



  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-24  1:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-09 14:45 Please test the merge of the concurrency branch Eli Zaretskii
2016-12-09 15:30 ` Robert Marshall
2016-12-09 16:26   ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-12-09 16:40     ` Paul Eggert
2016-12-09 16:54       ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-12-09 16:58       ` jpff
2016-12-09 17:06         ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-12-09 16:52     ` Robert Marshall
2016-12-09 23:09   ` Clément Pit--Claudel
2016-12-10  7:14     ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-12-10 15:05       ` Clément Pit--Claudel
2016-12-10 15:50         ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-12-09 22:33 ` David Caldwell
2016-12-10  6:50   ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-12-10 13:14   ` Alan Third
2016-12-10 14:06     ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-12-09 22:58 ` Karl Fogel
2016-12-10  7:09   ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-12-12  3:05     ` Karl Fogel
2016-12-09 23:19 ` Andrés Ramírez
2016-12-10  7:14   ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-12-10  8:09     ` Andreas Politz
2016-12-10  9:07       ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-12-10 16:05 ` Joseph Mingrone
2016-12-10 17:50   ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-12-10 16:33 ` Achim Gratz
2016-12-10 16:56   ` Filipe Silva
2016-12-10 17:56     ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-12-10 17:52   ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-12-10 17:36 ` Concurrency has landed (was: Please test the merge of the concurrency branch) Eli Zaretskii
2016-12-10 18:24   ` Concurrency has landed Eli Zaretskii
2016-12-10 18:26     ` raman
2016-12-10 18:36       ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-12-10 19:22     ` Paul Eggert
2016-12-22  4:52       ` Daniel Colascione
2016-12-22 19:23         ` Paul Eggert
2016-12-22 19:32           ` Daniel Colascione
2016-12-22 19:56             ` Paul Eggert
2016-12-24  0:52               ` Stefan Monnier
2016-12-24  1:51                 ` Paul Eggert [this message]
2016-12-24  4:49                   ` Stefan Monnier
2016-12-24  5:04                     ` Paul Eggert
2016-12-22 19:57             ` Davis Herring
2016-12-13 12:28   ` Phillip Lord
2016-12-13 16:09     ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-12-11  2:51 ` Please test the merge of the concurrency branch Ken Raeburn
2016-12-11  3:33   ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-12-11 19:40     ` Peter Wang
2016-12-11 20:31       ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-12-11  9:11   ` Michael Albinus
2016-12-11 13:54     ` Ken Raeburn
2016-12-11 15:14       ` Tramp and concurrency (was: Please test the merge of the concurrency branch) Michael Albinus
2016-12-11 15:45       ` Please test the merge of the concurrency branch Eli Zaretskii
2016-12-11 18:30 ` Daimrod
2016-12-11 18:42   ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-12-11 19:02     ` Daimrod

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=eea2eab4-c0c8-aeaa-ec49-a399449cd68e@cs.ucla.edu \
    --to=eggert@cs.ucla.edu \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).